April 25, 2011

by Meir Javedanfar

Almost a year after the discovery of the Stuxnet computer virus targeted at Iran’s nuclear program, this morning Reuters reports claims by an Iranian official that “Iran has been targeted by a second computer virus in a ‘cyber war’ waged by its enemies."

Even without knowing the specific details of this attack, there are still some things we can consider. First there is the damage it can cause on its own. Even if its limited, the new virus is bound to increase suspicion and paranoia amongst Iranian decision makers, especially those involved with the nuclear program.

The new attack could increase the voice of those who want all of the nuclear program’s computer system to be replaced as means of eradicating the presence of the virus completely. While this may be a viable solution, at the same time it could bring more delays for Iran’s already troubled and delayed nuclear program.

And if the system has already been replaced, then this is a clear sign that Iran is still susceptible to cyber attacks, against which it can do very little.

The cyber attacks do not only represent the ability of the attackers, they are also a clear sign of the success of the sanctions imposed against Iran. These have made it very difficult for Iran to acquire up to date technological equipment in the open market. This difficulty has slowed down the nuclear program, while making it more vulnerable.

When it comes to looking for blame, as well as suspecting outsiders, Iran’s nuclear scientists are also likely to point towards their country’s leadership, whose antagonistic behavior towards the international community has made their job far more difficult than it should be.



Subscribe to Middle East Progress Alerts

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

Setting the Record Straight

Determined to Reach a Common Objective

“We knew at the outset that the task would be difficult. We acknowledged that publicly and privately. We knew this would be a road with many bumps— and there have been many bumps—and that continues to this day. But we are not deterred. We are, to the contrary, determined more than ever to proceed to realize the common objective, which we all share, of a Middle East that is at peace with security and prosperity for the people of Israel, for Palestinians, and for all the people in the region. We will continue our efforts in that regard, undeterred and undaunted by the difficulties, the complexities or the bumps in the road.”—George Mitchell, special envoy for Middle East peace, remarks with Prime Minister Netanyahu, September 29, 2010

Middle East Analysis

Upcoming Events

The U.S. Agency for International Development and Conflict: Hard Lessons from the Field

May 17, 2011, 12:00pm – 1:15pm

From Afghanistan and Iraq to Pakistan, Somalia, and South Sudan, the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, is engaged daily in trying to help some of the most troubled nations on the planet make a lasting transition to stability, open markets, and democracy. Few areas of the agency’s work are more challenging or more controversial.

Join us for remarks by, and a roundtable with, the deputy administrator of USAID, Ambassador

more