December 1, 2010

President Mubarak votes in Egyptian parliamentary election (AP)

Recent elections in Jordan and Egypt have taken center stage. On November 9, Jordan held parliamentary elections where nearly 53 percent of eligible voters turned out to vote. Opposition parties fared poorly in the elections, some of which boycotted the elections in response to the passing of a new election law in May. The law, which created a new districting system, led some candidates with fewer votes to gain a seat in Parliament while others with higher vote totals in the same district did not gain a seat. There were select incidents of violence during the election including one death and several injuries. For the first time outside observers were allowed to monitor the elections. National Democratic Institute commented that “[the] elections showed a clear improvement over the nation’s 2007 polls, although a number of structural shortcomings and other problems should be addressed for future elections.”

Egyptian parliamentary elections were held on November 28. In the weeks before the vote, more than 1,200 Muslim Brotherhood supporters were arrested and party rallies were broken up and party candidates were banned from electoral lists. Opposition parties decried the elections for being marred with fraud and corruption, and said the election results were invalid. International observers and some local Egyptian groups were barred from monitoring the elections. Initial results showed the ruling National Democratic Party winning 209 of 508 seats while the Brotherhood did not secure any seats targeted by their 130 candidates. Runoff elections are scheduled for December 5 for seats where one candidate did not gain 50 percent of the vote.

For more information on top officials in the Egyptian and Jordanian governments, please see Middle East Bulletin (MEB) Background Basics (here and here).



Subscribe to Middle East Progress Alerts

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

Setting the Record Straight

Determined to Reach a Common Objective

“We knew at the outset that the task would be difficult. We acknowledged that publicly and privately. We knew this would be a road with many bumps— and there have been many bumps—and that continues to this day. But we are not deterred. We are, to the contrary, determined more than ever to proceed to realize the common objective, which we all share, of a Middle East that is at peace with security and prosperity for the people of Israel, for Palestinians, and for all the people in the region. We will continue our efforts in that regard, undeterred and undaunted by the difficulties, the complexities or the bumps in the road.”—George Mitchell, special envoy for Middle East peace, remarks with Prime Minister Netanyahu, September 29, 2010

Middle East Analysis

Upcoming Events

The U.S. Agency for International Development and Conflict: Hard Lessons from the Field

May 17, 2011, 12:00pm – 1:15pm

From Afghanistan and Iraq to Pakistan, Somalia, and South Sudan, the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, is engaged daily in trying to help some of the most troubled nations on the planet make a lasting transition to stability, open markets, and democracy. Few areas of the agency’s work are more challenging or more controversial.

Join us for remarks by, and a roundtable with, the deputy administrator of USAID, Ambassador

more