October 27, 2009

There is a dissonance in Jordan—every time Israelis and Palestinians seem to get close to an agreement, even a draft, two contradicting approaches emerge among Jordanian elite. On the one hand, Israeli-Palestinian peace is a Jordanian strategic interest. The way Jordan sees it, the alternative to peace is further deterioration which could lead to Israel’s completion of the security barrier and the pushing of the West Bank into the arms of Jordan, similar to what happened in Gaza. On the other hand, the decision makers still cannot seem to convey to the trans-Jordanian elite that one of the implications of an Israeli-Palestinian peace is the settlement of Palestinian refugees permanently in Jordan. …

In a way this is reminiscent of Israel’s paralysis when it comes to making difficult decisions on borders, Jerusalem and the refugees—Jordan knows what it ought to be doing but is paralyzed due to internal political dynamics.

King Abdullah is interested in an Israeli-Palestinian peace. He would sign a Clinton Parameters- based agreement tomorrow if it was up to him. It is possible that he is not handling his opposition now because an agreement does not seem imminent, something along the lines of ‘we’ll cross the bridge when we get there.’ But it shows the pressures he faces internally and what he will have to face when the moment of truth comes. Access the full interview>>



Subscribe to Middle East Progress Alerts

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

Setting the Record Straight

Determined to Reach a Common Objective

“We knew at the outset that the task would be difficult. We acknowledged that publicly and privately. We knew this would be a road with many bumps— and there have been many bumps—and that continues to this day. But we are not deterred. We are, to the contrary, determined more than ever to proceed to realize the common objective, which we all share, of a Middle East that is at peace with security and prosperity for the people of Israel, for Palestinians, and for all the people in the region. We will continue our efforts in that regard, undeterred and undaunted by the difficulties, the complexities or the bumps in the road.”—George Mitchell, special envoy for Middle East peace, remarks with Prime Minister Netanyahu, September 29, 2010

Middle East Analysis

Upcoming Events

The U.S. Agency for International Development and Conflict: Hard Lessons from the Field

May 17, 2011, 12:00pm – 1:15pm

From Afghanistan and Iraq to Pakistan, Somalia, and South Sudan, the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, is engaged daily in trying to help some of the most troubled nations on the planet make a lasting transition to stability, open markets, and democracy. Few areas of the agency’s work are more challenging or more controversial.

Join us for remarks by, and a roundtable with, the deputy administrator of USAID, Ambassador

more