May 5, 2009

The Quartet (European Union, Russia, United Nations and United States) was constituted in November 2001 as a means to coordinate international peace efforts. Since then it has worked to advance the peace process in line with a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Quartet has issued several critical plans and statements that guide its peace-making efforts. In particular:

The Road Map Peace Plan

On April 30, 2003, the Quartet presented “A Performance- Based Roadmap to a Permanent Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.” The plan called on the two sides to take specific steps at each of the plan’s three phases.

Phase I: April 30, 2003 – May 2003
Phase I outlined a comprehensive list of obligations for each side. These include:
• The Palestinians must end violence and the two sides must restart security cooperation based on the Tenet plan.
• Palestinians must “undertake comprehensive political reform,” including drafting a constitution, building Palestinian institutions and strengthening governance.
• Israel must “take all necessary steps to normalize Palestinian life,” withdraw from land held since September 28, 2000, freeze all settlement activity and dismantle outposts erected since 2001.

Phase II: June 2003 – December 2003

Phase II would be focused on the creation of a Palestinian state with “provisional borders and attributes of sovereignty.”
• The Quartet will determine the transition into Phase II based on both sides’ progress on Phase I steps.
• Begins after Palestinian elections and ends with creation of independent Palestinian state with provisional borders.
• Builds on the institution- building of Phase I.
• Includes an international conference to support the Palestinian economy and lead to a provisional Palestinian state. This conference would revive multilateral engagement and aim for a comprehensive peace settlement.

Phase III: 2004 – 2005

Phase III would be focused on coming to a final agreement between Israel and the Palestinians on a two-state solution and reaching a comprehensive regional peace.
• Transition into this phase dependent on Quartet’s “consensus judgment,” which includes monitoring of both sides’ actions.
• Convenes a second international conference to reach a permanent solution on final status issues, including the issues of borders, Jerusalem, refugees and settlements, and a comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace.
• Continues institution-building and security efforts.

Palestinian Government Policies
Following the Hamas victory in parliamentary elections in January 2006, the Quartet laid out the terms to which it expected all members of a Palestinian government to adhere. It also stated that future donations to any Palestinian government would inevitably be determined by adherence to these principles. These include:
• The recognition of Israel;
• A commitment to nonviolence and;
• An adherence to all previous international agreements reached, including the Road Map.

On February 2, 2007, during Saudi-led negotiations to end Hamas-Fatah fighting, and again following the formation of the national unity government on March 17, 2007, the Quartet reiterated this stance toward a Palestinian government.

For additional information about the Quartet, see our Background Basics entitled, “Understanding the Quartet.”



Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

08/20/10
Center for American Progress Welcomes Resumption of Direct Talks  —
08/10/10
A View from the Ground  —Darbaz Kosrat Rasul, chair, Rebaz Foundation. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.
08/03/10
U.S.-Turkish Relations  —Ambassador Francis J. Ricciardone, Jr., recently returned deputy ambassador in Afghanistan; former ambassador to Egypt (2005-2008); and deputy chief of mission and charge d'affaires in U.S. embassy in Turkey (1995-1999). Congressional Testimony.

Setting the Record Straight

Eye Still on the Ball

“Adverse developments in Iraq will be (and will look to be) increasingly a function of the Obama Team taking their eye off of the ball and rushing to declare mission accomplished. Yes, in such a scenario the Iraqis should bear most of the blame, but the part that is due to U.S. action or inaction will be Obama's responsibility. And it will matter. Iraq is at the center of a region that every president since Jimmy Carter has identified as vital to our national security. Iraq is next door to, and the playground for mischief from, the most thorny national security challenge the United States faces: a nuclear-weapons-seeking Iranian regime. These inconvenient facts mean that if the Iraqi situation demands more focused and costly U.S. attention, it will likely get it. At that point, what sort of domestic coalition will be available for President Obama's Iraq policy?”
—Peter Feaver, director, Triangle Institute for Security Studies; former director for defense policy and arms control, National Security Council, “Obama’s Iraq Speech: Another Missed Opportunity,” Foreign Policy, August 3, 2010versus
  • “Iraq is a strategically important place in the Middle East, just by its geographic location, by its population, by the influence it's had in the Middle East for a long time. So neighboring countries from around the Middle East have an interest inside of Iraq.

    “But I will tell you that I think Iraqis themselves are nationalistic in nature, and that's why it's important. A strong Iraq will defend itself against interference from outside countries, and I think as we build a strong Iraq and as we continue to build a strong security mechanism and as we continue to help them economically and diplomatically, that will make it less likely of others from the outside being able to interfere.

    “Now, for the vacuum as we see today, again, I remind everyone is that we still have a significant presence here, and we are not going to—we will not allow undue maligned influence on the Iraqi government as they attempt to form their government. What we're trying to do is provide them the space and time for them to do that, and we will continue to do that post 1 September. We'll still have a significant civilian presence, and again, we'll still have 50,000 troops on the ground here to ensure that this government can be formed by the Iraqis. And that all the other nations respect their sovereignty as they go about forming their government.”
    —General Ray Odierno, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, interview, “This Week” with Christiane Amanpour, August 8, 2010
  • Middle East Analysis

    Upcoming Events

    The Road Forward on Middle East Peace

    Event: October 1, 2009 - 12:00pm-1:00pm

    Introduction:
    Winnie Stachelberg, Senior Vice President for External Affairs, Center for American Progress

    Featured speaker:
    Congressman Robert Wexler (D-FL)

    Moderated by:
    Moran Banai, U.S. Editor of Middle East Bulletin

    WATCH HERE