September 18, 2008

By winning the Kadima primary contest on September 17, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni became the leader of the Kadima party. President Shimon Peres will now most likely ask Livni to form a government within 28 days, with a potential 14-day extension. If she is able to form a coalition, Livni will serve as prime minister for the remainder of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s term. If she is unable to form a coalition, Peres may ask another party chair to form a coalition within 28 days. In the event that this fails as well, the Knesset must enter into new general elections within 90 days. Olmert will remain as acting prime minister until a new government is formed.

To form a coalition, Livni now faces the challenge of compromising with existing parties in the Knesset. She faces the following landscape:

Kadima: 29 seats – anchor party of the coalition
Head: Tzipi Livni
Main concerns:
• Intends to continue negotiations toward a two-state solution with the Palestinians based on the 2003 Road Map peace plan and the Annapolis process
• Former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon left Likud in 2005 and formed the centrist Kadima party, bringing with him prominent officials from both the left and right of the political spectrum

Labor-Meimad:
19 seats – part of Olmert governing coalition
Head: Ehud Barak
Main concerns:
• Favors two-state solution
• Supports an end to settlement construction and evacuation of unauthorized outposts
Previously expressed interest in replacing the Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann, who seeks to drastically cut the powers of Israel’s High Court
•Barak likely wants to retain his post as defense minister; his party will also want to retain the Education ministry; they may be willing to cede ground on demands for the Justice portfolio

Likud: 12 seats
Head: Benjamin Netanyahu
Main concerns:
• Its platform calls for the “wholeness of the homeland,” yet Netanyahu signed Wye River Accord and other agreements with Palestinians when he was prime minister
• Opposes Jerusalem as a shared capital for both Israelis and Palestinians

Shas: 12 seats – in Olmert’s coalition
Head: Eli Yishai
Main concerns:
Demands clear and open stances on negotiations with Palestinians and opposes negotiating core issues, particularly the red line issue of Jerusalem
Seeks increased financial support for its religious education and social welfare systems, including the issue of increasing child allowances, and increased construction in West Bank settlements
• Following Livni’s victory, Yishai said that Livni must agree to Shas demands for the party to join the coalition

Yisrael Beiteinu: 11 seats – left Olmert coalition in January 2008 over negotiations with the Palestinians
Head: Avigdor Lieberman
Main concerns:
• Supports transferring Arab Israelis from Israel to Palestinian control, without their consent
• Refuses to discuss the core issues

National Union – National Religious Party: 9 seats
Head: Benny Elon
Main concerns:
Opposes Jerusalem as a shared capital for both Israelis and Palestinians and supports settlement expansion
• Does not believe PA is legitimate and advocates annulment of Oslo Accords

United Torah Judaism (UTJ): 6 seats – Olmert tried unsuccessfully to get UTJ into his coalition in early 2008
Head: Yakov Litzman
Main concerns:
Combines Hasidic, non-Zionist Agudat Israel and Lithuanian, ultra-Orthodox Degel HaTorah parties
• Believes, according to divine right, that Israel belongs to the Jewish people
Disapproves of all labor and commerce on Shabbat; doesn’t recognize non-Orthodox Jewish movements

Meretz-Yahad: 5 seats – Meretz previously refused to join a coalition government that included Yisrael Beiteinu
Head: Haim Oron
Main concerns:
• Supports an end to settlement activity and a withdrawal from the West Bank
• Advocates negotiations with the Palestinian Authority, including on the issue of Jerusalem

Gil Pensioners Party: 4 seats – part of Olmert’s coalition
Head: Yitzhak Galanti
Main concerns:
• Advocates for financial support of the elderly

United Arab List: 4 seats
Chair: Ibrahim Sarsur
Main concerns:
• Supports the creation of an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as the capital
• Calls for the recognition of the Arab minority and demands more rights

Hadash: 3 seats
Head: Mohammad Barakeh
Main concerns:
• Based on Israel’s Communist Party
• Advocates for peace with the Palestinians and Arab states, while also encouraging equal rights for Israel’s Arab population
• Calls for Israel’s withdrawal to pre-1967 borders

Justice for the Elderly: 3 seats
Head: Moshe Sharoni
Main concerns:
Splinter of Gil Pensioners Party
• Advocates for additional support for the elderly

National Democratic Assembly: 3 seats
Head: Jamal Zahalka
Main concerns:
• Seeks the complete separation of religion and state in Israel
• Supports a fair resolution to the Palestinian question, and the provision of equal rights to Israel’s Arab population



Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

03/16/10
Maintaining the Unbreakable Bond  —Robert Wexler, former Congressman; president, S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace. Interview with Middle East Progress.
03/11/10
First Reactions  —
03/09/10
Understanding Ankara  —Morton Abramowitz, former U.S. ambassador to Turkey (1989-91); senior fellow, Century Foundation. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.

Setting the Record Straight

U.S. and Israel Have Shared Interests

“I think it's a big deal. This is a fight that the White House has picked. … I think it surprised Netanyahu. Netanyahu apologized to Vice President Biden … And he expressed regret. … And they thought the thing had been put to bed … And then for some reason … the White House at the highest levels—the president decided let's make a big fuss about this … I do not know, honestly, why the president chose to pick a big public fight just when it was all dying down with Israel.”
—William Kristol, editor, Weekly Standard, Fox News Sunday, March 14, 2010versus
  • “[T]he president, the vice president, secretary of State did exactly the right thing for American interests and for Israel ... [F]irst of all, they were speaking for many secretaries of State, many presidents in the past who have had Israeli settlements shoved in their face before, during, and after a visit by Israel. ... So there's a lot of backstory here, this isn't just about that trip.“Then let's look at the moment we're in. We have an Israeli prime minister from the right who actually could deliver the right. He's done actually a lot of good things on the ground in the West Bank. You have to give him credit for that. We have the best Palestinian leadership we've had in a long time. And we have a Sunni Arab world obsessed with Iran, ready to work with Israel more than ever. You'd think in that context Israel could say to the United States, you know, ‘You're doing all this for us, we're just going to stop settlements in Jerusalem, in the West Bank, not temporarily, not moratorium. We're going to give you a chance to actually test the other side whether they're for real. ... Barack Obama, this Bud's for you. We're going to do this for the American people.’ Is that anti-Semitism, is that anti-Israelism, to ask that of an Israeli government, to ask, act first in its own interest and then in America's interest? I don't think so.”
    —Tom Friedman, columnist, The New York Times, Meet the Press, March 14, 2010
  • Middle East Analysis

    Upcoming Events

    The Road Forward on Middle East Peace

    Event: October 1, 2009 - 12:00pm-1:00pm

    Introduction:
    Winnie Stachelberg, Senior Vice President for External Affairs, Center for American Progress

    Featured speaker:
    Congressman Robert Wexler (D-FL)

    Moderated by:
    Moran Banai, U.S. Editor of Middle East Bulletin

    WATCH HERE