April 25, 2008
“Washington ought to ignore the inevitable op-ed urgings to ‘explain ourselves better’ to Moscow; or to be careful not to ‘feed the Kremlin’s paranoia’ or ‘push it into the corner’; or to be therapeutic and gentle in light of Russia’s traumatic historic memories; or to constantly reinvent progressively larger and juicier ‘carrots’ for the Kremlin–as if the street-smart and tough-as-nails former KGB men who run Russia today (and sit on its fabulous wealth, to boot) could be ‘induced’ to deviate from their vision of what is good for Russia (and themselves) by Washington’s proffers."
--Leon Aron, director, Russian studies, American Enterprise Institute, Russian Outlook, January 16, 2008
  • “Opponents of engagement would prefer that disputes form the basis of U.S.-Russia relations an unstable foundation, upon which sustainable cooperation, peace and security cannot be built. But the proper approach is to recognize these differences, not ignore them, and fully engage Russia. We should abandon incendiary rhetoric, avoid lecturing and move away from personality-driven policies. We can recognize Russia’s shortcomings, but this should not preclude us from strong diplomatic engagement in pursuit of our own interests. We must work together to manage regional conflicts in North Korea and Iran. It’s doubtful we can solve these problems without Russian help.”
    --Lee H. Hamilton, director, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars; former chairman, House Foreign Affairs Committee, keynote address at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace event on ”200 Years of U.S.-Russian Diplomatic Relations,” September 24, 2007


  • Subscribe to Middle East Progress Alerts

    Support Middle East Progress

    In-Depth Coverage

    Original Commentaries

    Setting the Record Straight

    Determined to Reach a Common Objective

    “We knew at the outset that the task would be difficult. We acknowledged that publicly and privately. We knew this would be a road with many bumps— and there have been many bumps—and that continues to this day. But we are not deterred. We are, to the contrary, determined more than ever to proceed to realize the common objective, which we all share, of a Middle East that is at peace with security and prosperity for the people of Israel, for Palestinians, and for all the people in the region. We will continue our efforts in that regard, undeterred and undaunted by the difficulties, the complexities or the bumps in the road.”—George Mitchell, special envoy for Middle East peace, remarks with Prime Minister Netanyahu, September 29, 2010

    Middle East Analysis

    Upcoming Events

    The U.S. Agency for International Development and Conflict: Hard Lessons from the Field

    May 17, 2011, 12:00pm – 1:15pm

    From Afghanistan and Iraq to Pakistan, Somalia, and South Sudan, the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, is engaged daily in trying to help some of the most troubled nations on the planet make a lasting transition to stability, open markets, and democracy. Few areas of the agency’s work are more challenging or more controversial.

    Join us for remarks by, and a roundtable with, the deputy administrator of USAID, Ambassador

    more