Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

07/08/08
Planning the Transition  —Ghaith al-Omari, director of advocacy, American Task Force on Palestine; former foreign policy adviser to Palestinian President Abbas. Original Commentary for Middle East Bulletin.
07/07/08
Moving Forward in Lebanon After Doha: Bridging Deep Divides  —Mona Yacoubian, director of the Lebanon Working Group, U.S. Institute of Peace. Original Commentary for Middle East Bulletin.
06/27/08
Dealing with the Challenge of Prisoners  —Brigadier General (Ret.) Ilan Paz, former head of the Israeli Civil Administration in the West Bank (2002-2005). Interview with Middle East Bulletin.

Setting the Record Straight

Israeli-Syrian Peace Could Alter Regional Dynamic

“I think [the Israelis] are making a mistake trying to negotiate with Syria now, because I don’t think Syria has any independent ability to make decisions. Over the past several years, Syria has become functionally a satellite of Iran, so that if the Israelis really wanted to negotiate with somebody, they ought to be in Tehran, not in Damascus. … I think it will be seen as a mistake in their domestic politics, and it certainly wouldn’t fit my cost-benefit analysis of a fruitful place to have discussions.”
—John Bolton, senior fellow, American Enterprise Institute & former U.S. ambassador to the UN, interview with NationalJournal.com, May 23, 2008 versus
  • "An Israeli-Syrian peace would be based on interests … The first thing the Syrians want is the Golan [Heights], but they want other things too. … Syria wants to be defined differently than Iran and come back to the center of the international system. In terms of Israeli interests, I think the first thing would be no all-out warfare. … In addition, an agreement with Syria would include the larger Arab world and not the Assad government alone. Such an agreement would also undermine Hezbollah, Hamas and extreme Islamist movements. … The United States is needed for addressing the Syrian interests, beyond the Golan, including removal of Syria from the ‘axis of evil’ and economic incentives.”
    —Major General (Ret.) Danny Rothschild, former IDF coordinator of activities in the Palestinian territories (1991-95) & president, Israeli Council for Peace and Security, event ,"Peace with Syria," July 14, 2008 (translated by Middle East Bulletin)
  • Middle East Analysis

    April 4, 2008

    Goals and Methodology
    The Arab Human Development Report series released between 2002 and 2005 examined a wide range of social, political and economic development issues in the Middle East. The reports were sponsored by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development (AFESD) and the Arab Gulf Program for United Nations Organizations (AGFUND), and each report involved more than 100 predominantly Arab thinkers and researchers who were independent of the sponsoring organizations. The goal of the reports was to examine development deficits in Arab countries and provide concrete advice for improvement. The reports have since been supplemented by UNDP programs, which provide further support and analysis of development efforts in the region. A new series of reports focusing on human security will begin in the second half of 2008.

    Major Challenges Outlined by the Reports

    The inaugural 2002 report outlined three fundamental deficits that face the Arab world, which are addressed in detail in subsequent reports:

    1. Underdeveloped human capabilities (2003 report). The dissemination of knowledge faces social, institutional, economic and political impediments. Arab society today is characterized by illiteracy, restricted media access, lack of access to education and translation channels and the declining quality of education in general. Governments do not adequately support scientific research and education, and their restrictions on freedom of expression inhibit open education and the dissemination of knowledge.

    2. Restrictions on freedom (2004 report). Oppression from leaders at home and intervention from abroad have discouraged an environment of freedom from prospering. Many Arab countries lack a system of good governance based upon the rule of law, laws upheld by an independent judiciary, popular representation and accountability of leaders to their people. Censorship and other restrictive laws curtail rights of association, expression and opinion, preventing an effective free press. Intelligence services and overbearing executive authority inhibit meaningful political expression and participation, such as the formation of political parties and fair elections. A lack of confidence in the political system as a whole has led to political violence and terrorism, as well as political passivity.

    3. Inequality between men and women (2005 report). Cultural, social, economic and political factors put women at a disadvantage in many Arab societies. Tribalism, patriarchy and biased religious interpretations have resulted in women’s unequal treatment, including personal status law discrimination, restrictions on economic activity and limitations on access to healthcare and quality education. The challenges that have restricted human capabilities and freedom in Arab societies have had a larger impact on women, impinging broader social development.

    Recommendations for Improvement
    The reports, broadly, call for:
    1) Building Arab capabilities and knowledge: Governments should increase support of primary and secondary education systems, increase investment in science, technology and research and development and embrace different forms of media.

    2) Using human capabilities through re-invigorating growth and productivity: Governments should serve a more regulatory role while encouraging a mobilization of the private sector. In addition, governments should promote regional economic specializations and inter-Arab cooperation in order to benefit from globalization.

    3) Promoting good governance: The expansion of political representation, reform of government administration and legal systems, strengthening of institutions of local governance, liberation of civil-society organizations, fostering of free and responsible media and respect for human rights and freedoms will each aid in the promotion of good governance.