February 15, 2008

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Syrian President Bashar Assad (AP)

The Palestinian Reform and Development Plan (PRDP) was presented by Prime Minister Salaam Fayyad at the Paris Donors Conference on December 17, 2007. The three-year plan aims to lay the foundations for a future Palestinian state and build its infrastructure and economy. It has been widely endorsed by donor governments, including the EU and the United States, along with the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

Governance:
The PRDP proposes the improvement of the institutional capabilities of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) through a number of reforms and new initiatives, including:
• the trimming of the size of the PNA to an effective, affordable organization;
• the creation of a new security service that is loyal to the PNA along with improvements in the justice system and increased accountability and transparency; and,
• defining the relationship between local government and the PNA and making government more accessible.

Social Development:
The plan also calls for the development of the capacities of the Palestinian people by:
• focusing on efficiently coordinating social protection programs to maximize their benefit;
• expanding the Palestinian education system as population expands as well as supporting higher and vocational education;
• rebuilding the Palestinian territories’ health system and making it affordable for its citizens; and,
• empowering traditionally-neglected groups through women and youth empowerment programs.

Economic and Private Sector Development:
The PRDP envisions an open, free market economy based on the private sector, which it seeks to develop through:
• economic programs targeted at agriculture, industry and services, tourism, and the construction of new, affordable housing;
• the building of economic capabilities, such as the industrial and tourism sectors;
• targeted support for small- and medium-sized enterprises; and,
• seeking further markets for the Palestinian economy.

Public Infrastructure Development:
The plan notes a deficiency in public infrastructure due to conflict and under-development, which it aims to repair through:
• focusing on the building of new roads as well as improving the electric grid;
• outlining a need for greater water supply as well as a plan for wastewater treatment and solid waste facilities; and,
• proposing public recreation and cultural facilities.

Possible Macroeconomic/Fiscal Framework
To create a fiscal system that is less erratic and more independent the plan proposes a fiscal outline through 2010 that aims to bring recurrent expenditures down from 54% of GDP to 44% and better target these expenditures toward those in need. It also seeks to reduce the PNA’s budget deficit. This outline, however, is premised on gradual improvements in movement and access as well as PNA control of Gaza. Continued economic problems are forecasted if those impediments remain.

Implementation
The PRDP calls for tri-partite action to be successful.
• The PNA must impose law and order, implement key economic reforms and build effective governing institutions.
• Israel needs to remove the obstacles that hinder the proper functioning of government and the economy and hence the creation of a truly viable Palestinian state.
• The international community needs to provide aid to the PNA and support the peace process.

Additionally, the plan calls for better coordination and integration within the PNA and better coordination with NGOs and other parties working in the Palestinian territories as well as ‘untied’ donor commitments that allow the PNA to use funds as needed to meet objectives in a timely manner.



Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

03/16/10
Maintaining the Unbreakable Bond  —Robert Wexler, former Congressman; president, S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace. Interview with Middle East Progress.
03/11/10
First Reactions  —
03/09/10
Understanding Ankara  —Morton Abramowitz, former U.S. ambassador to Turkey (1989-91); senior fellow, Century Foundation. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.

Setting the Record Straight

U.S. and Israel Have Shared Interests

“I think it's a big deal. This is a fight that the White House has picked. … I think it surprised Netanyahu. Netanyahu apologized to Vice President Biden … And he expressed regret. … And they thought the thing had been put to bed … And then for some reason … the White House at the highest levels—the president decided let's make a big fuss about this … I do not know, honestly, why the president chose to pick a big public fight just when it was all dying down with Israel.”
—William Kristol, editor, Weekly Standard, Fox News Sunday, March 14, 2010versus
  • “[T]he president, the vice president, secretary of State did exactly the right thing for American interests and for Israel ... [F]irst of all, they were speaking for many secretaries of State, many presidents in the past who have had Israeli settlements shoved in their face before, during, and after a visit by Israel. ... So there's a lot of backstory here, this isn't just about that trip.“Then let's look at the moment we're in. We have an Israeli prime minister from the right who actually could deliver the right. He's done actually a lot of good things on the ground in the West Bank. You have to give him credit for that. We have the best Palestinian leadership we've had in a long time. And we have a Sunni Arab world obsessed with Iran, ready to work with Israel more than ever. You'd think in that context Israel could say to the United States, you know, ‘You're doing all this for us, we're just going to stop settlements in Jerusalem, in the West Bank, not temporarily, not moratorium. We're going to give you a chance to actually test the other side whether they're for real. ... Barack Obama, this Bud's for you. We're going to do this for the American people.’ Is that anti-Semitism, is that anti-Israelism, to ask that of an Israeli government, to ask, act first in its own interest and then in America's interest? I don't think so.”
    —Tom Friedman, columnist, The New York Times, Meet the Press, March 14, 2010
  • Middle East Analysis

    Upcoming Events

    The Road Forward on Middle East Peace

    Event: October 1, 2009 - 12:00pm-1:00pm

    Introduction:
    Winnie Stachelberg, Senior Vice President for External Affairs, Center for American Progress

    Featured speaker:
    Congressman Robert Wexler (D-FL)

    Moderated by:
    Moran Banai, U.S. Editor of Middle East Bulletin

    WATCH HERE