February 15, 2008

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Syrian President Bashar Assad (AP)

The Palestinian Reform and Development Plan (PRDP) was presented by Prime Minister Salaam Fayyad at the Paris Donors Conference on December 17, 2007. The three-year plan aims to lay the foundations for a future Palestinian state and build its infrastructure and economy. It has been widely endorsed by donor governments, including the EU and the United States, along with the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

Governance:
The PRDP proposes the improvement of the institutional capabilities of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) through a number of reforms and new initiatives, including:
• the trimming of the size of the PNA to an effective, affordable organization;
• the creation of a new security service that is loyal to the PNA along with improvements in the justice system and increased accountability and transparency; and,
• defining the relationship between local government and the PNA and making government more accessible.

Social Development:
The plan also calls for the development of the capacities of the Palestinian people by:
• focusing on efficiently coordinating social protection programs to maximize their benefit;
• expanding the Palestinian education system as population expands as well as supporting higher and vocational education;
• rebuilding the Palestinian territories’ health system and making it affordable for its citizens; and,
• empowering traditionally-neglected groups through women and youth empowerment programs.

Economic and Private Sector Development:
The PRDP envisions an open, free market economy based on the private sector, which it seeks to develop through:
• economic programs targeted at agriculture, industry and services, tourism, and the construction of new, affordable housing;
• the building of economic capabilities, such as the industrial and tourism sectors;
• targeted support for small- and medium-sized enterprises; and,
• seeking further markets for the Palestinian economy.

Public Infrastructure Development:
The plan notes a deficiency in public infrastructure due to conflict and under-development, which it aims to repair through:
• focusing on the building of new roads as well as improving the electric grid;
• outlining a need for greater water supply as well as a plan for wastewater treatment and solid waste facilities; and,
• proposing public recreation and cultural facilities.

Possible Macroeconomic/Fiscal Framework
To create a fiscal system that is less erratic and more independent the plan proposes a fiscal outline through 2010 that aims to bring recurrent expenditures down from 54% of GDP to 44% and better target these expenditures toward those in need. It also seeks to reduce the PNA’s budget deficit. This outline, however, is premised on gradual improvements in movement and access as well as PNA control of Gaza. Continued economic problems are forecasted if those impediments remain.

Implementation
The PRDP calls for tri-partite action to be successful.
• The PNA must impose law and order, implement key economic reforms and build effective governing institutions.
• Israel needs to remove the obstacles that hinder the proper functioning of government and the economy and hence the creation of a truly viable Palestinian state.
• The international community needs to provide aid to the PNA and support the peace process.

Additionally, the plan calls for better coordination and integration within the PNA and better coordination with NGOs and other parties working in the Palestinian territories as well as ‘untied’ donor commitments that allow the PNA to use funds as needed to meet objectives in a timely manner.



Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

03/09/10
Understanding Ankara  —Morton Abramowitz, former U.S. ambassador to Turkey (1989-91); senior fellow, Century Foundation. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.
03/04/10
A Preview of the Elections  —
03/02/10
Understanding U.S.-Syrian Relations  — Theodore H. Kattouf, former U.S. ambassador to Syria and the United Arab Emirates; president and CEO, AMIDEAST. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.

Setting the Record Straight

Turkey-Israel Ties Stronger than Public Denunciations

“The contours of the new Turkish foreign policy indicate a propensity to distance itself from the West and a quest for enhanced relations with Muslim countries, particularly those located along Turkey’s borders. One clear manifestation of this new policy is the current tensions between Turkey and Israel.”
—Efraim Inbar, director, Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies, article, “Israeli-Turkish Tensions and Beyond,” Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, February 2010versus
  • “Turkey cannot afford to alienate Israel totally either. The ambitions of its foreign policy necessitate that it maintain good and credible relations with all the parties in the region. Neither should it lose its way in intra-Arab squabbles or render its foreign policy hostage to the, at times, delirious reactions of an excitable public. Just as Israel should not allow its current foreign minister’s world view and personality get in the way of safeguarding a critical strategic relation.”
    —Soli Özel, professor of international relations and political science, Istanbul Bilgi University, analysis, “Turkey-Israel Relations: Where to Next?” The German Marshal Fund of the United States, Turkey Series, March 3, 2010
  • Middle East Analysis

    Upcoming Events

    The Road Forward on Middle East Peace

    Event: October 1, 2009 - 12:00pm-1:00pm

    Introduction:
    Winnie Stachelberg, Senior Vice President for External Affairs, Center for American Progress

    Featured speaker:
    Congressman Robert Wexler (D-FL)

    Moderated by:
    Moran Banai, U.S. Editor of Middle East Bulletin

    WATCH HERE