Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

07/02/09
The U.S. Pullout from Iraqi Cities  —
06/25/09
Understanding the Situation in Iran  —Geneive Abdo, fellow, The Century Foundation; former Iran correspondent, The Guardian (1998-2001)
06/23/09
Solving the Problem of the Old City  —Michael Bell, former Canadian ambassador to Egypt, Israel and Jordan; co-director, Jerusalem Old City Initiative, University of Windsor. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.

Setting the Record Straight

Potential Partner for Regional Stability

“As long as the current radical regime is in power in Damascus, there won’t be any negotiated peace even of the most superficial variety because the conflict is indispensible to the Syrian dictatorship. And the most probably type of change in Syria—though its likelihood is still low—to a radical Islamist regime would make any such peace even less likely.”
—Barry Rubin, director, Global Research in International Affairs Center, IDC Herzliya, “Peace on the Borderline,” The Rubin Report, May 31, 2009versus
  • “The al-Asad regime in Syria continues to play the dangerous game of allowing or accepting extremist networks and terrorist facilitators to operate from and through Syrian territory. ... However, unlike Iran, Syria’s motives probably stem from short-sighted calculations rather than ideology. It is possible that over time Syria could emerge as a partner in promoting security in the Levant and in the region.”
    —General David Petraeus, commander, U.S. Central Command, testimony to the House Armed Services Committee, “The Afghanistan-Pakistan Strategic Review and the Posture of U.S. Central Command,” April 2, 2009
  • Middle East Analysis

    Upcoming Events

    WATCH: Prospects for a Two-State Solution: Understanding Challenges and Creating Opportunities

    Featured panelists:

    Brigadier General (Ret.) Ilan Paz, former head of the Israeli Civil Administration in the West Bank (2002-2005)
    Ghaith al-Omari, advocacy director, American Task Force on Palestine; advisor, Middle East Progress; former advisor to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas

    Discussion moderated by:

    Brian Katulis, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress, advisor, Middle East Progress

    When: Friday, March 20, 2009
    Program: 9:00am to 10:30am

    WATCH HERE

    February 15, 2008

    Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Syrian President Bashar Assad (AP)

    The Palestinian Reform and Development Plan (PRDP) was presented by Prime Minister Salaam Fayyad at the Paris Donors Conference on December 17, 2007. The three-year plan aims to lay the foundations for a future Palestinian state and build its infrastructure and economy. It has been widely endorsed by donor governments, including the EU and the United States, along with the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

    Governance:
    The PRDP proposes the improvement of the institutional capabilities of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) through a number of reforms and new initiatives, including:
    • the trimming of the size of the PNA to an effective, affordable organization;
    • the creation of a new security service that is loyal to the PNA along with improvements in the justice system and increased accountability and transparency; and,
    • defining the relationship between local government and the PNA and making government more accessible.

    Social Development:
    The plan also calls for the development of the capacities of the Palestinian people by:
    • focusing on efficiently coordinating social protection programs to maximize their benefit;
    • expanding the Palestinian education system as population expands as well as supporting higher and vocational education;
    • rebuilding the Palestinian territories’ health system and making it affordable for its citizens; and,
    • empowering traditionally-neglected groups through women and youth empowerment programs.

    Economic and Private Sector Development:
    The PRDP envisions an open, free market economy based on the private sector, which it seeks to develop through:
    • economic programs targeted at agriculture, industry and services, tourism, and the construction of new, affordable housing;
    • the building of economic capabilities, such as the industrial and tourism sectors;
    • targeted support for small- and medium-sized enterprises; and,
    • seeking further markets for the Palestinian economy.

    Public Infrastructure Development:
    The plan notes a deficiency in public infrastructure due to conflict and under-development, which it aims to repair through:
    • focusing on the building of new roads as well as improving the electric grid;
    • outlining a need for greater water supply as well as a plan for wastewater treatment and solid waste facilities; and,
    • proposing public recreation and cultural facilities.

    Possible Macroeconomic/Fiscal Framework
    To create a fiscal system that is less erratic and more independent the plan proposes a fiscal outline through 2010 that aims to bring recurrent expenditures down from 54% of GDP to 44% and better target these expenditures toward those in need. It also seeks to reduce the PNA’s budget deficit. This outline, however, is premised on gradual improvements in movement and access as well as PNA control of Gaza. Continued economic problems are forecasted if those impediments remain.

    Implementation
    The PRDP calls for tri-partite action to be successful.
    • The PNA must impose law and order, implement key economic reforms and build effective governing institutions.
    • Israel needs to remove the obstacles that hinder the proper functioning of government and the economy and hence the creation of a truly viable Palestinian state.
    • The international community needs to provide aid to the PNA and support the peace process.

    Additionally, the plan calls for better coordination and integration within the PNA and better coordination with NGOs and other parties working in the Palestinian territories as well as ‘untied’ donor commitments that allow the PNA to use funds as needed to meet objectives in a timely manner.