Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

07/02/09
The U.S. Pullout from Iraqi Cities  —
06/25/09
Understanding the Situation in Iran  —Geneive Abdo, fellow, The Century Foundation; former Iran correspondent, The Guardian (1998-2001)
06/23/09
Solving the Problem of the Old City  —Michael Bell, former Canadian ambassador to Egypt, Israel and Jordan; co-director, Jerusalem Old City Initiative, University of Windsor. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.

Setting the Record Straight

Potential Partner for Regional Stability

“As long as the current radical regime is in power in Damascus, there won’t be any negotiated peace even of the most superficial variety because the conflict is indispensible to the Syrian dictatorship. And the most probably type of change in Syria—though its likelihood is still low—to a radical Islamist regime would make any such peace even less likely.”
—Barry Rubin, director, Global Research in International Affairs Center, IDC Herzliya, “Peace on the Borderline,” The Rubin Report, May 31, 2009versus
  • “The al-Asad regime in Syria continues to play the dangerous game of allowing or accepting extremist networks and terrorist facilitators to operate from and through Syrian territory. ... However, unlike Iran, Syria’s motives probably stem from short-sighted calculations rather than ideology. It is possible that over time Syria could emerge as a partner in promoting security in the Levant and in the region.”
    —General David Petraeus, commander, U.S. Central Command, testimony to the House Armed Services Committee, “The Afghanistan-Pakistan Strategic Review and the Posture of U.S. Central Command,” April 2, 2009
  • Middle East Analysis

    Upcoming Events

    WATCH: Prospects for a Two-State Solution: Understanding Challenges and Creating Opportunities

    Featured panelists:

    Brigadier General (Ret.) Ilan Paz, former head of the Israeli Civil Administration in the West Bank (2002-2005)
    Ghaith al-Omari, advocacy director, American Task Force on Palestine; advisor, Middle East Progress; former advisor to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas

    Discussion moderated by:

    Brian Katulis, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress, advisor, Middle East Progress

    When: Friday, March 20, 2009
    Program: 9:00am to 10:30am

    WATCH HERE

    February 11, 2008

    Election Basics:
    -Parliamentary election, scheduled for March 14, 2008; 4 year terms, 290 seats in approximately 200 constituencies. The unicameral Majles-e-Shura-ye-Eslami (Islamic Consultative Council), has the power to propose and pass legislation and act as a check on the President.
    -Candidates must be between 30 and 75 years old; elected by popular vote.
    -7,168 candidates registered to run for the election.
    -Controlled by the Guardian Council and Interior Ministry.
    -Official campaigning begins one week before the elections.

    Candidate Vetting

    Candidates are vetted multiple times to ensure that they meet basic requirements and are committed to the constitution and the Islamic republic. The first round of vetting is conducted by local executive boards appointed by the Interior Ministry and often is biased toward the political views of the current government. Later rounds are conducted by the Guardian Council, composed of six clerics and six lawyers. More than 2,400 candidates have been barred from running thus far. Disqualified candidates can appeal, but appeals are rarely granted. A final list will be issued on March 5.

    Political Dynamics

    Reformists have had 70 percent of their candidates barred from the elections. Only a few of their senior and most electable officials remain. Reformists, however, have appealed to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and may still contest the election. Conservatives in Iran have split into two rival factions. One group is aligned with President Ahmadinejad while another has formed around former nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani. Larijani’s faction is critical of Ahmadinejad’s economic policies as well as his approach to Iran’s nuclear program. The election is perceived in Iran as a measure of Ahmadinejad’s popularity as he has struggled to address economic problems and has recently had some of his initiatives publicly struck down by Khamenei.